在 Hacker News Daily 上看到 Apple M1 為什麼這麼快又省電的解釋，可以當作一種看法：
可以在 Thread reader 上面讀：「Thread by @ErrataRob on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App」。
看起來 Apple 在規劃的時候就有考慮 x86 模擬問題，所以在記憶體架構上直接實做了對應的模式，大幅降低了當年 Microsoft 在 Surface 上遇到的問題：
3/ The biggest hurdle was "memory-ordering", the order in which two CPUs see modifications in memory by each other. It's the biggest problem affecting Microsoft's emulation of x86 on their Arm-based "Surface" laptops.
4/ So Apple simply cheated. They added Intel's memory-ordering to their CPU. When running translated x86 code, they switch the mode of the CPU to conform to Intel's memory ordering.
另外一個比較有趣的架構是，Apple M1 上面的兩個 core 有不同的架構，一顆對效能最佳化，另外一顆對效率最佳化：
13/ Apple's strategy is to use two processors: one designed to run fast above 3 GHz, and the other to run slow below 2 GHz. Apple calls this their "performance" and "efficiency" processors. Each optimized to be their best at their goal.
在 wikipedia 上的介紹也有提到這兩個 core 的不同，像是 L1 cache 的差異 (128KB 與 192KB)，以及功耗的差異：
The M1 has four high-performance "Firestorm" and four energy-efficient "Icestorm" cores, providing a configuration similar to ARM big.LITTLE and Intel's Lakefield processors. This combination allows power-use optimizations not possible with Apple–Intel architecture devices. Apple claims the energy-efficient cores use one tenth the power of the high-performance ones. The high-performance cores have 192 KB of instruction cache and 128 KB of data cache and share a 12 MB L2 cache; the energy-efficient cores have a 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and a shared 4 MB L2 cache. The Icestorm "E cluster" has a frequency of 0.6–2.064 GHz and a maximum power consumption of 1.3 W. The Firestorm "P cluster" has a frequency of 0.6–3.204 GHz and a maximum power consumption of 13.8 W.
再加上其他架構上的改善 (像是針對 JavaScript 的指令集、L1 的提昇，以及用 TSMC 最新製程)，累積起來就變成把 Intel 版本壓在地上磨蹭的結果了...
