Home » Posts tagged "owasp"

AWS WAF 提供隨時更新的 Managed Rules

AWS WAF 推出了隨時更新的 Managed Rule:「Ready-to-Use Managed Rules Now Available on AWS WAF」。

這些 ruleset 是由 3rd-party 提供的:

Choose from preconfigured RuleGroups provided in the AWS Marketplace by industry leading security experts: Alert Logic, Fortinet, Imperva, Trend Micro and TrustWave.

然後隨時更新:

Rules are automatically updated as new threats emerge and offer a wide range of protections, including OWASP Top 10 mitigations, bad-bot defenses, and virtual patching against recent CVE’s.

然後是要收費的:

Each RuleGroup is the product of a Seller’s unique expertise, made available to you at an affordable pay-as-you-go price.

AWS Marketplace 的「Managed Rules for AWS WAF - Web Application Firewall」裡拿兩家來看看。

趨勢的「Trend Micro Managed Rules for AWS WAF - WebServer (Apache, Nginx)」與「Trend Micro Managed Rules for AWS WAF - Content Management System (CMS)」都是:

Charge per month in each available region (pro-rated by the hour) $5.00 / unit
Charge per million requests in each available region $0.20 / unit

Imperva 則是提供不一樣的選擇,在「Imperva - Managed Rules for WordPress Protection on AWS WAF」是:

Charge per month in each available region (pro-rated by the hour) $30.00 / unit
Charge per million requests in each available region $0.60 / unit

而「Imperva - Managed Rules for IP Reputation on AWS WAF」則是:

Charge per month in each available region (pro-rated by the hour) $40.00 / unit
Charge per million requests in each available region $0.40 / unit

AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall)

Amazon 推出了 AWS WAF,也就是 Web Application Firewall:「New – AWS WAF」。

架構在 CloudFront 上的安全服務,可以想像到會依照 request 數量收費外,rule 本身也要收費,不太便宜的感覺:

AWS WAF is available today anywhere CloudFront is available. Pricing is $5 per web ACL, $1 per rule, and $0.60 per million HTTP requests.

這個收費標準看起來不像是會把 ModSecurity 預設的 rule 丟進去養... 不過 WAF 主要是用在對軟體主體沒有修改能力時的替代方案 (沒有 source code,或是線上服務緊急需要防堵),以這個角度來看的話好像還好?

另外一點也許可以找人問問看,WAF 不是設計在 ELB 上,算是策略考量嗎?

OWASP 取消與 RSA Conference 的合作...

RSA Security 收了 NSA 的錢,並且使用 NSA 所偏好的亂數演算法的事情被爆料出來後 (而且這個演算法已經被認為是 NSA 埋後門的演算法),一直有要求 RSA Security 解釋的聲音。但 RSA Security 卻完全沒有解釋。

想當然的,陸陸續續開始有人退出今年的 RSA Conference。一開始是 F-Secure 的 CRO (Chief Research Officer) 宣布退出:「An Open Letter to the Chiefs of EMC and RSA」,後來也有不少資安領域的專家退出 (可以參考 iThome 的文章):「資安專家群起抵制RSA安全會議」。

最新的消息是 OWASP 官方決定取消與 RSA Conference 的合作關係:「OWASP terminates marketing agreement with RSA Conference. Board member cancels class out of protest.」,不過 OWASP 正式的公告還沒出來。

OWASP 在 Web 安全性這個領域可是赫赫有名... 這下今年二月底的 RSA Conference 還會有多少人「跟進」呢... 會不會停辦?

OWASP's Top 10,2013 版

Slashdot 上看到 OWASP 給出 2013 年的網站安全威脅 Top 10 名單:「OWASP Top 10 2013 Released」。

一如往常,Slashdot 的第一個 comment 還是很經典 XDDD

The offered list of vulnerabilities is in a pdf.

這... XD

在 Wiki 上有一份非 PDF 的版本可以看:「Category:OWASP Top Ten Project」,可以跟「Rails' Insecure Defaults」(副標題「13 Security Gotchas You Should Know About」) 一起看 (不是看 Rails 的問題,是看有哪些攻擊技巧)。

Archives