Apple 在歐盟 DMA 的法規下被強制開放 App Store 與各種限制

昨天科技圈最熱門的消息應該是 Apple 公開了在歐盟區開放 App Store 限制的計畫:「Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union」,Hacker News 上的討論也很熱鬧,也提出了很多蘋果想盡辦法讓你不要換過去所設定的障礙:「Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union (apple.com)」。

從文章可以看出 Apple 不斷的用 FUD 在擋,而且從文章裡面就可以看出來 Apple 極度不情願開放這塊肥肉。

除了文章的不情願態度外,Apple 也試著要建立各種機制讓 developer 無法轉移,其中目前最毒的是 Core Technology Fee 的設計,即使 app 後續會透過第三方的 app marketplace 下載,你仍然要付給 Apple 一筆很貴的費用:

Core Technology Fee — iOS apps distributed from the App Store and/or an alternative app marketplace will pay €0.50 for each first annual install per year over a 1 million threshold.

不確定現有的 DMA 是否有阻止的能力,但這個是目前已經看到的重點項目,歐盟應該會有動作...

另外看一些群組討論,Apple 很不願意放 App Store 出來,看起來這個功能是被鎖到 countryd 層級的,無法單純註冊歐盟 App Store 的帳號就能安裝。

反正先坐著等一兩個月看新聞消化...

AWS 要在歐洲建立一個完全獨立的 Cloud 系統

CNBC 上看到的新聞,AWS 打算在歐洲建立一個完全獨立的 Cloud 系統:「Amazon launches European ‘sovereign’ cloud as EU data debate rages」。

AWS European Sovereign Cloud 會是完全獨立的 cloud:

Amazon on Wednesday said it will launch an independent cloud for Europe aimed at companies in highly-regulated industries and the public sector.

這邊講的「完全獨立」,除了東西都放在歐洲以外,連員工都是歐盟員工:

Customers of the new system will be able to keep certain data in the European Union and only EU-resident AWS employees who are located in the 27-nation bloc will have control of the operations and support for the sovereign cloud.

這個作法倒是頗特別的,看起來是想要試著說服歐盟這樣是 OK 的?推出的時候可以看看還有什麼特別的東西?

歐盟通過可替換電池的法案

先前在「歐盟要推可替換的手機電池」這邊提到歐盟要推可替換電池的法案,剛剛看到 Hacker News 上面的討論,在七月通過了:「It's official: Smartphones will need to have replaceable batteries by 2027」,歐盟的新聞稿在「Council adopts new regulation on batteries and waste batteries」這邊。

這次法案包括了所有電池:

The regulation of the European Parliament and the Council will apply to all batteries including all waste portable batteries, electric vehicle batteries, industrial batteries, starting, lightning and ignition (SLI) batteries (used mostly for vehicles and machinery) and batteries for light means of transport (e.g. electric bikes, e-mopeds, e-scooters).

其中行動裝置的部分在這次看到時間表了,可替換電池的方案看起來會在 2028 強制:

The regulation provides that by 2027 portable batteries incorporated into appliances should be removable and replaceable by the end-user, leaving sufficient time for operators to adapt the design of their products to this requirement.

算起來還有四年多的時間,來看看各家改變的速度...

AWS 加開中歐區 (瑞士,蘇黎世)

AWS 在瑞士蘇黎世開了新的區域,代碼 eu-central-2:「A New AWS Region Opens in Switzerland」,其中代碼 eu-central-1 是德國,這次的歐洲中不稍微往南邊一點開。

I am pleased to announce today the opening of our 28th AWS Region: Europe (Zurich), also known by its API name: eu-central-2.

歐洲的 region 愈來愈多了,但可以看出來東歐一直還沒有點,不過以目前戰火的情況看起來應該不會太快...

歐盟更新了對於 Cookie 同意方式的準則

TechCrunch 上面看到的,歐盟更新了對於 Cookie 同意方式的準則:「No cookie consent walls — and no, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU data protection body」,英文版的 PDF 文件可以在「Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679」這邊看到。

這篇準則主要是在說明,什麼情境下取得的「同意」才是有效的。主要在在說明使用者與開發者權力不對等的情況下,GDPR 會擋下哪些對使用者不利的情況。

準則文件裡開頭的地方先解釋了什麼是 free/freely given,然後給了不少範例,另外翻例子的時候還看到在雇傭關係下因為員工有無法拒絕的壓力,這時候的同意也未必是有效的,藉以保護員工...

而 TechCrunch 的文章則是拉出了兩個目前在 internet 上很常用的情況來報導 (cookie wall 與 scrolling),解釋現在 internet 上面常用的這些方法在 GDPR 下並沒有取得授權。

這樣的話 Medium 的 login wall 應該也會踩到 (強迫你要註冊 Medium 才能看,這邊會需要同意 Medium 的使用條款),這次歐盟文件算是蠻清楚的,多幾次訴訟,再讓 GDPR 跑個幾年,應該有會有不同的方法了...

AWS 義大利區開張

這是這幾天 AWS 新開的區域:「Now Open – AWS Europe (Milan) Region」,這樣就成為歐洲的第六個 region,與美洲的數量也一樣了 (美國四個,加拿大一個,南美一個)。

不過用 aws ec2 describe-regions | jq '.Regions[].RegionName' | xargs -n1 aws ec2 describe-availability-zones --region 掃了一輪,只有 us-east-1 (美東一區)、us-west-2 (美西二區) 與 ap-northeast-1 (日本) 有超過三個 AZ,這樣難怪 AWS 會考慮在日本多開一個大阪區了...

Backblaze 開了歐洲區機房

Backblaze 開了歐洲機房,所以包括了一般性的 Computer BackupB2 Cloud Storage 都可以選擇要放哪邊了...

歐洲的點是放在荷蘭:

Big news: Our first European data center, in Amsterdam, is open and accepting customer data!

價錢也都跟美國的相同:

Whether you choose EU Central or US West, your pricing for our products will be unchanged:

對於在意資料放美國機房的問題應該有緩解一些...

AI 版的星海爭霸二將直接透過歐洲區的 Battle.net 匿名與人類對戰

前幾天 Blizzard 公佈的消息,DeepMind 的星海爭霸二 AI (AlphaStar) 將會透過 Blizzard 的 Battle.net 歐洲區伺服器跟人類對戰:「DeepMind Research on Ladder」。

Experimental versions of DeepMind’s StarCraft II agent, AlphaStar, will soon play a small number of games on the competitive ladder in Europe as part of ongoing research into AI.

預設是不會對到的,需要選擇參與:

If you would like the chance to help DeepMind with its research by matching against AlphaStar, you can opt in by clicking the “opt-in” button on the in-game popup window. You can alter your opt-in selection at any time by using the “DeepMind opt-in” button on the 1v1 Versus menu.

但你仍然不會知道對手是人還是 AI,而且如同一般對戰情況,這會影響到你的戰績:

For scientific test purposes, DeepMind will be benchmarking AlphaStar’s performance by playing anonymously during a series of blind trial matches. This means the StarCraft community will not know which matches AlphaStar is playing, to help ensure that all games are played under the same conditions. AlphaStar plays with built-in restrictions that the DeepMind team has defined in consultation with pro players. A win or a loss against AlphaStar will affect your MMR as normal.

okay,這樣大概知道為什麼只開放歐洲區了...

加州從今年七月開始,禁止 AI 偽裝成人類 (前幾天也有一些新聞在報導):「A California law now means chatbots have to disclose they’re not human」,對應的法條在「Bill Text - SB-1001 Bots: disclosure」這邊可以看到:

17941. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to use a bot to communicate or interact with another person in California online, with the intent to mislead the other person about its artificial identity for the purpose of knowingly deceiving the person about the content of the communication in order to incentivize a purchase or sale of goods or services in a commercial transaction or to influence a vote in an election. A person using a bot shall not be liable under this section if the person discloses that it is a bot.

(b) The disclosure required by this section shall be clear, conspicuous, and reasonably designed to inform persons with whom the bot communicates or interacts that it is a bot.

而加州是 Blizzard Entertainment 的總部...

法條上面對「online platform」有設計排除條款,不過如果只算星海二的人數,有可能不到這個豁免限制... 所以得避開而改用歐洲區來測試?

(c) “Online platform” means any public-facing Internet Web site, Web application, or digital application, including a social network or publication, that has 10,000,000 or more unique monthly United States visitors or users for a majority of months during the preceding 12 months.

(c) This chapter does not impose a duty on service providers of online platforms, including, but not limited to, Web hosting and Internet service providers.

美國軍方應該是超級關注這個議題,相較於 AlphaGo 或是 AlphaZero 是資訊完全透明的遊戲,這次要踏入非對稱資訊的遊戲。

如果在這個領域上有成果的話,可以預期未來的戰爭 (yeah 實體戰爭) 會開始大量採用 AI 了...

CloudFront 在北美增加了一堆節點...

CloudFront 在北美增加了一堆節點:「Amazon CloudFront announces ten new Edge locations in North America, Europe, and Asia」。

北美一口氣增開了八個,提升了 40% 的 capacity:

Amazon CloudFront announces ten new Edge locations, adding to our global presence. Eight of the new Edge locations are in North America: Houston, Texas (our first location in this city), Chicago, Illinois, Newark, New Jersey, Los Angeles, California, and Ashburn, Virginia. We also added an Edge location in Berlin, Germany, as well as one in Tokyo, Japan.

With this launch, CloudFront will increase its request processing capacity by up to 40%, on average, in the North American cities.

另外不怎麼意外的又增加了東京...

歐洲研究機構的資助者推動研究論文的開放存取

在「Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions」這邊看到歐洲 11 個研究機構資助者成立了「cOAlition S」,推動研究論文的開放存取。

目標是在 2020 年開始,由這些機構所資助的研究都必須投在符合完全開放條件的平台上:

cOAlition S signals the commitment to implement, by 1 January 2020, the necessary measures to fulfil its main principle: “By 2020 scientific publications that result from research funded by public grants provided by participating national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms.

而現在大約只有 15%:

According to a December 2017 analysis, only around 15% of journals publish work immediately as open access (see ‘Publishing models’) — financed by charging per-article fees to authors or their funders, negotiating general open-publishing contracts with funders, or through other means.

用這種方式降低那些收錢才能下載的平台的影響力...