ScyllaDB 1.7 支援 Counters 了

在「Scylla release: version 1.7」這邊看到 ScyllaDB 支援 Counters 的消息了 (雖然剛出來,掛著 Experimental 的消息):

Scylla now supports Counters as a native type. A counter column is a column whose value is a 64-bit signed integer and on which two operations are supported: incrementing and decrementing.

這其實是 Cassandra 其中一個強項,針對 counter 這種應用特化的資料型態。

ScyllaDB 1.7 要支援 Cassandra 的 Counter 了

Counter 是 Cassandra 裡一個特別的資料型態,總算是要 porting 進 ScyllaDB 了:「Scylla 1.7 introduces experimental support for counters」。


  • once deleted, counter column value cannot be used again—this is a consequence of the fact that counters can only be incremented or decremented, they cannot be set to any specific value
  • a table cannot contain both counter and regular columns—without this limitation it wouldn’t be possible to provide proper atomicity and isolation guarantees for updates that modify both counters and regular columns in a single row
  • counter columns cannot be members of primary key
  • updates are not idempotent – in case of a write failure the client cannot safely retry the request
    counter columns cannot have time-to-live set

跟 Cassandra 一樣是透過 CRDT 實做的,行為上會是 eventually consistency:

Scylla implements counters using state-based conflict-free replicated data types (CRDT), which allow atomic operations, like increment or decrement, to be performed locally without the need for synchronization between nodes.

在「Scylla Status and Roadmap」這邊可以看到其他會在 1.7 出現的功能。

Amazon EC2 上的 gettimeofday 與 clock_gettime 的效能

看到「Two frequently used system calls are ~77% slower on AWS EC2」這篇在講 gettimeofdayclock_gettime 的效能,另外搜資料時發現應該也是作者提問的「gettimeofday() not using vDSO?」這篇。

EC2 比較新的機器上用 tsc 應該是沒問題的 (在 2015 的時候官方就這樣建議了):

it seems tsc support in Xen has improved with version 4.0 and with improved CPU support in Sandy Bridge+ platforms. Modern EC2 machines should be okay with tsc. Check Xen version using dmesg | grep "Xen version". Amazon recommended the tsc clocksource already in re:Invent 2015 ( I'm not yet running to production with this, but the situation doesn't seem as bad as implied by packagecloud.

開了一台 t2.micro 看 /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource 看起來目前是設成 xen

ubuntu@ip-172-31-22-165:~$ cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource

在「(CMP402) Amazon EC2 Instances Deep Dive」這邊也可以看到一些資料 (page 24 與 page 25):

PostgreSQL 9.5 釋出,UPSERT!

PostgreSQL 9.5 正式發行,這次新增了大家期待已久的 UPSERT 功能:「PostgreSQL 9.5: UPSERT, Row Level Security, and Big Data」。

SQL:2003 正式定義出 UPSERT,被稱為 Merge,不過看網路上一般還是比較習慣 UPSERT 這個用法:

A relational database management system uses SQL MERGE (also called upsert) statements to INSERT new records or UPDATE existing records depending on whether condition matches.

也就是當沒資料的時候就 INSERT,有資料的時候就 UPDATE 的語法。常見的使用情境是拿來當 counter 用 (雖然這很傷資料庫的效能)。

沒有 UPSERT 的時候只能用 transaction 或是 store procedure 搭出來,效能上會比在 database engine 裡實作來的差,所以 UPSERT 還是被實作出來了。