Home » 2017 » September (Page 6)

在 AWS 的 NGINX Plus

主要是看到「Quick Start Update: Deploy NGINX Plus on the AWS Cloud」這篇才知道在 AWS Marketplace 上有「NGINX Plus - Amazon Linux AMI (HVM)」可以用,而且有三十天試用期可以使用:

30 Day Free Trial Available - NGINX Plus is a high performance load balancer, edge cache and origin server for web content, streaming media and API traffic. It complements the load balancing capabilities of Amazon ELB and ALB by adding support for multiple HTTP, HTTP/2, and SSL/TLS services, content-based routing rules, caching, autoscaling support, and traffic management policies. NGINX Plus for AWS is provided and supported by the original creators of NGINX web server.

所有機器的年約都是 USD$2500/year,使用 t2.{nano,micro,small} 的話因為 hourly 的價錢乘以一年後反而還比較便宜,記得別亂買...

另外這代表可以直接付錢測試功能... (或是免費,如果 free trial 還沒用)

Amazon Route 53 對地區的微調功能

Amazon Route 53 推出新功能,針對地區微調資源的比重:「Amazon Route 53 Traffic Flow Announces Support For Geoproximity Routing With Traffic Biasing」。

範例大致上說明了這個功能的能力,假設你在兩個點都有服務可以提供,你可以利用這個功能微調某個比率到某個點:

For example, suppose you have EC2 instances in the AWS US East (Ohio) region and in the US West (Oregon) region. When a user in Los Angeles browses to your website, geoproximity routing will route the DNS query to the EC2 instances in the US West (Oregon) region because it's closer geographically. If you want a larger portion of users in the middle of the United States to be routed to one region, you can specify a positive bias for that region, a negative bias for the other region, or both.

有點 CDN 的想法在裡面...

AWS ALB 可以設定 IP address 當作後端伺服器了

AWS ALB 推出直接設定 IP address 當作後端伺服器的功能:「New – Application Load Balancing via IP Address to AWS & On-Premises Resources」。

ip – Targets are registered as IP addresses. You can use any IPv4 address from the load balancer’s VPC CIDR for targets within load balancer’s VPC and any IPv4 address from the RFC 1918 ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16) or the RFC 6598 range (100.64.0.0/10) for targets located outside the load balancer’s VPC (this includes Peered VPC, EC2-Classic, and on-premises targets reachable over Direct Connect or VPN).

這樣就能拿 ALB 當 load balancer 把部份內容接到自己機房內的伺服器群了,一種隨便串的概念... (可以透過 AWS Direct Connect 或是 VPN 直接串,所以對外的部份就直接是 AWS 端,對內要怎麼接就隨便接...)

AWS 推出「VMware Cloud on AWS」

AWS 推出了「VMware Cloud on AWS」服務:「VMware Cloud on AWS – Now Available」。

由圖可以看出來 AWS 的架構與 VMware 其實是獨立的,只是在網路層上打通:

文字上可以看到更細的敘述,跟 AWS 的架構很不一樣:

This offering is sold, delivered, supported, and billed by VMware. It supports custom-sized VMs, runs any OS that is supported by VMware, and makes use of single-tenant bare-metal AWS infrastructure so that you can bring your Windows Server licenses to the cloud. Each SDDC (Software-Defined Data Center) consists of 4 to 16 instances, each with 36 cores, 512 GB of memory, and 15.2 TB of NVMe storage. Clusters currently run in a single AWS Availability Zone (AZ) with support in the works for clusters that span AZs. You can spin up an entire VMware SDDC in a couple of hours, and scale host capacity up and down in minutes.

網路層也不同,甚至支援 multicase:

The NSX networking platform (powered by the AWS Elastic Networking Adapter running at up to 25 Gbps) supports multicast traffic, separate networks for management and compute, and IPSec VPN tunnels to on-premises firewalls, routers, and so forth.

目前只有在 us-west-2 可以用:

This service is initially available in the US West (Oregon) region through VMware and members of the VMware Partner Network.

這樣感覺用 AWS Direct Connect 就可以解不少問題,這個合作的幫助不太大... XD

Firefox 的 Headless 模式

Google Chrome 推出 Headless 模式後,Firefox 也推出了:「Headless mode」。

目前正式版是 55 版,只有 Linux 版本有支援,下一個版本 56 版就會包括 Windows 與 Mac 了:

Headless Firefox works on Fx55+ on Linux, and 56+ on Windows/Mac.

然後大家也都是以 Selenium 為重心,所以使用上應該不會是大問題...

InnoDB 與 MyRocks 之間的取捨

MyRocks 的主要作者 Mark Callaghan 整理了一篇關於大台機器下,資料可以放到記憶體內的效能比較:「In-memory sysbench, a larger server and contention - part 1」。

這其實才是一般會遇到的情況:當事業夠大時,直接花錢買 1TB RAM + 數片 PCI-E SSD 的機器用錢換效能... (主要應該會在記憶體花不少錢,剛剛查了一下,現在白牌的 server 一台大約七十萬就可以擺平?兩台做 HA 也才一百四十萬,對有這個規模的單位來說通常不是大問題...)

而三種不同的 case 裡面,最後這個應該是最接近真實情況的:

可以看到 InnoDB 在幾乎所有項目都還是超越 MyRocks (只有 random-points 與 insert-only 輸)。

不知道後續的開發能量還會有多少... (因為 Facebook 的用法跟一般情況不一樣)

Amazon Aurora 支援快速複製

Amazon Aurora 宣佈支援快速複製:「Amazon Aurora Fast Database Cloning」。

對於 2TB 的資料大約五分鐘就完成了:

This means my 2TB snapshot restore job that used to take an hour is now ready in about 5 minutes – and most of that time is spent provisioning a new RDS instance.

主要是得力於後端 storage 的部份可以實做 copy-on-write 架構:

By taking advantage of Aurora’s underlying distributed storage engine you’re able to quickly and cheaply create a copy-on-write clone of your database.

可以快速複製就可以很快的驗證一些事情,像是可以直接測試 ALTER TABLE 需要的時間,或是事前演練...

Archives